The Argument Against Drilling In Alaska’s Arctic National...

Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), the crowned jewel of the nation’s 544 refuges is in danger of destruction (Lamar and Markey 12). ANWR has been in existence since 1960 and has slowly become one of the most controversial topics to hit Congress. ANWR is composed of 19 million acres on the northeast coast of Alaska. Although the government has been provided with this immense land they are fighting to gain more land. Why? ANWR is the second biggest oil field that is owned by the U.S. Now the government wants more land to construct oil reserves. The refuge is home to many endangered species such as migratory birds, polar bears, and wolves (Lynne and Roberts 1). Most of ANWR’s designated oil area is owned by indigenous Alaskan†¦show more content†¦Calf survival rates have been extremely low in areas or mountain range and without their discrete areas caribous are threaten more by predators (Whitten 2004). The reserves will also constrain caribou from moving about because of all the traffic that would be created and the pipe crossings. That’s no way a precious creature should live. That’s why Alaskan natives oppose drilling. Another reason against drilling much research has shown that all the oil that will be produced will only last for about six months. The fact that the British Petroleum has greater potential to produce more oil and natural gasses (Markey 2004) than ANWR so why bother with it , supporting the case that drilling is pointless. Then there is the percentage that after oil production of ANWR, the foreign oil dependency will only drop from 56% to 50% (Markey 2004).Then the oil produced would reach the market ten years later after it was produced, leaving the gas price decrease to one percent(Lamar and Markey 12). There was also the reality of natural gases. ANWR does not confirm any sign of them, when President Bush ordered exploration for natural gasses (Klyza and Ford-Martin 1).Again proving drilling pointless. In addition to concern about changes, was if drilling were to happen the negatives it would create to the tundra. Drilling on any form of earth is harmful in general. But because of how beloved the terrain is to the native, it only creates more conflicts.Show MoreRelatedAlaska Oil Drilling: A Threat to Biodiversity1606 Words   |  6 Pagesthe issue of opening the last of Alaskas pristine frontiers for oil drilling exploration appears may finally be moving towards a long-sought resolution. At the heart of this over thirty-year old conflict, waged bitterly between environmental activists and major petroleum producers, is a parcel of land containing nearly 20 million acres of untouched environmental resources known as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). While the ecological importance of the ANWR region is largely undisputed, asRead MoreArctic National Wildlife Refuge Dispute965 Words   |  4 PagesArctic National Wildlife Refuge, or ANWR, is a refuge geared toward preservin g national wildlife in northeastern Alaska. ANWR is about 19 million acres, in space, and contains a potential drilling spot for oil and petroleum. The potential drilling spot is a small area known as the 10-02 Area. It is only 1.5 million acres, or 8%, of ANWR, would even be considered for development (What is ANWR). The controversy surrounding ANWR is whether to drill or not to drill into the 10-02 area. Some people wantRead MoreDRILLING IN ANWR1374 Words   |  6 PagesRecently, though a new argument has come to Alaska, one that could destroy the traditions of the Gwich’in forever. Politicians, environmentalists, economists and neighbors now fight over the prospect of oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Many of the arguments for drilling are worth consideration; however, in comparison to the evidence against it, they are neither convincing nor compelling. In order to fully understand why drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is such a big deal;Read MoreEssay about Anwr - We Should Drill3741 Words   |  15 PagesANWR: Drilling Mandatory or Unnecessary Shannon Bowerman Hour 7 Laughlin -- February 12, 2008 English Research Paper Shannon Bowerman Hour 7 February 12, 2008 English Research Paper – Introduction Since 1987, the issue of whether or not drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) should be allowed has been one of the concerns of political figures, as well as many Americans. This issue has been fought before the Senate at least

Symptoms And Treatment Of Ocd - 2051 Words

Introduction OCD is a psychological disorder that affects a wide variety of people; OCD affects approximately two to three percent of the general population. (Ambramowitz, Taylor, and McKay 2009). Ambramowitz and others also state that with this percent, OCD affects about twice as many people as schizophrenia. With this many people affected, the question of what the most effective way of treating the condition needs to be asked. The answer to the question of what the most effective way of treating OCD was answered using the methodology of reviewing many different studies that researched the three main options for treatment. These options include; medication, therapy, and a combination. The effectiveness is determined by the percent†¦show more content†¦The supposed obsession must cause great distress or consume at least an hour of time per day. (DSM-VI). The effected must also recognize that the disease is an excessive or unreasonable; these do not apply to children. OCD causes people to think differently and to want to obsess or fixate on things that they know they should not be focused on as much. There are many different things that go towards helping people to fix this so they can have their life back. The only question is; what is the best way to do so? One main way to fix this issue is serotonin reuptake inhibitors. This is a pharmacological treatment option, and the inhibitors include drugs such as Clomipramine and Sertraline. Clomipramine and Sertraline are primarily the same thing as far as effectiveness and function go. However, there is one difference between the two medications, and that is that Sertraline is better tolerated by the human body than Clomipramine is. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors work by interrupting and affecting the serotonin receptors in the brain. There are, however, a few problems with the inhibitor drugs. One major problem is that these medications are only effective in some patients (Ambramowitz, etc., 2009). This was proven in a study of 18 randomized trials in which the effect size was 0.91. The people in this study were given pharmacological treatment designed to treat OCD. Some patients showed symptoms after they were taken off of the

Inspector Goole Essay Paper Example For Students

Inspector Goole Essay Paper The Birlings are finding it hard to take any responsibility over the girl, Eva Smiths death. The particular role Priestley has given Inspector Goole is to bring the family to understand they have a moral responsibility, if not a legal one but they dont seem to understand. Sheila is the only one who is taking in anything that the Inspector has brought up, he makes many repeated comments such as, each of you helped to kill her, we are responsible for each other yet only Sheila accepts liability for what has happened. The Inspectors speech at the end recalls the actions of each individual, which brought Eva to her death. By confronting each character the intention is to inflict guilt, the abrupt parting of the Inspector leaves the characters in confusion and the only person to answer their questions now are themselves. Here we realise their true characters and it seems to be only the young ones who take some blame. Sheila has been affected the most taking full responsibility, Eric although squiffy realises that Sheilas right, so without her, Eric would not have realised his involvement which is why she is a vital influence to the others. Gerald is the only one who was willing to help her, he gave her a home and food. But was this really in order to help, or for him to have some mistress on the side? Although, Geralds actions probably have the least contribution to Evas death, even if he was only using her as a mistress. But now the truth is out what will the consequences be with Sheila? It makes the audience think. Mr and Mrs Birling, the stubborn couple, feel no sympathy for the girl. Priestley uses these characters in conjunction with his aim. He created Mr Birling as a money-mad, selfish man who cares about nothing but his power and status. This helps the audience see him and his capitalist views as crude. Yes, yes. Horrid business but I dont see why you should come here, I dont see where I come into this. This is evidence of how he tries to dismiss the fact that his immoral actions have any connection with the death of Eva Smith. Whilst the Inspector is still questioning the suicide, Mr Birling constantly comments on his wealth and status, how he plays golf with the Chief of Police, how he used to be Mayor and how he has potential Knighthood. As Preistley tries to build up Birlings views within his character the audience become more and more against him. By turning the audience against these people Priestley can now make the aim clearer, that you shouldnt support snobbish, complacent capitalists and we are all responsible for each other. Priestley is trying to get across that if we are like the Birlings then we need to change by being more considerate and caring towards others. Power, wealth and status does not mean that one has any more right and should receive more respect than another. Sheila abused her power and is ashamed of it, Eric is also aware of his wrong doings. But what about Mr and Mrs Birling? They show no sign of interest in the message the Inspector is trying to get across. All they care about is what society will think of them now. As soon as Mr Birling hears that his son has stolen from him, his first reaction is I must cover this up as soon as I can, most of this is bound to come out. Therell be a public scandal. He is only worried about himself, not once has he realised that the Inspector is there for Eva and not him.